Bird Research:
Behavioral Ecology, Physiology, Conservation Biology, and Ecological
Endocrinology
Curtis
S. Adkisson, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute Robert L. Curry, Villanova University Hugh I. Ellis,
University of San Diego Ronald L. Mumme, Allegheny College Stephan
J. Schoech, University of Memphis
[ Biennial Contents |
Biennial
97-98 | Research ]
[ Curtis
S. Adkisson | Robert L. Curry | Hugh I.
Ellis | Ronald L. Mumme | Stephan
J. Schoech ]
Curtis Adkisson (see photo, this page). Blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) are
abundant in human-dominated habitats throughout eastern North America
and are spreading westward. It is unclear how hundreds of blue jays
exist in the citrus groves (Keck Grove) adjacent to Archbold Biological
Station (S of Archbold Rd.). One clue comes from their caching of acorns
obtained from the Red Hill section of Archbold, to the north, and from
the mixed woods and scrub to the west. By placing transmitters on
selected birds, Adkisson established that these birds spend virtually
all their time in the groves, except when they are harvesting acorns to
cache in their home ranges. In 1997 and 1999 certain individuals
regularly flew several round trips of at least 4 km daily for 2 months,
in caching about 5000 acorns from Red Hill, and from areas west of the
grove, in the grove. During winter (October-March), they appeared to
remain in the immediate vicinity of those caches, virtually undetectable
unless wearing an active transmitter. A hypothesis is that this is a
response to wintering Cooper’s hawks. In the dry fall of 2000, caching
activity was lower than in the previous 8 years, perhaps in response to
a poor acorn crop. The effect of this disturbance on jay populations is
unknown. By continuing to band and transmitter jays living in the Keck
Grove, Adkisson hopes to learn how this fluctuation in local climate has
affected their abundance.
Robert Curry’s (see photo, this page) research on Florida scrub-jays (Aphelocoma
coerulescens) during 1999-00 focused on the influence of ecological
factors on timing of breeding. Curry’s work included 4 months at
Archbold during a sabbatical when he edited and analyzed the Station’s
weather data sets, and integrated these with data on scrub-jay
demography (1970-00) and on availability of foods used by the jays
(1988-00) (see also; Bird Research, pages 10-11). This research focuses
in part on the possible effects of climate change on breeding phenology,
which could have implications for demography and population persistence.
For example, egg-laying date in the Mexican jay (A. ultramarina)
has advanced in Arizona in association with warmer spring nights.
Evidence from Archbold scrub-jays provides a counter-example: there has
been no trend in laying date over the past 3 decades. Over the same
period, climate variables have changed little in peninsular Florida.
Whether scrub-jay phenology would shift even if Florida’s climate were
to change is questionable, because the timing of breeding appears to be
determined by abundance of food (acorns, lizards, and frogs) well in
advance of laying and not by weather just prior to clutch initiation.
Relationships between phenology, demography, and food resources suggest
that landscape-level habitat patterns are important for scrub-jay
population success. Destruction of seasonal wetlands, though used little
by foraging scrub-jays, could reduce herp abundance, delay onset of
scrub-jay breeding, and influence demography. Habitat fragmentation, and
resulting reduction in fire frequency and changes in successional
dynamics, could affect acorn production, resulting in further
consequences for scrub-jay demography.
Hugh Ellis (see photo, this page). Previously, Glen Woolfenden, Reed Bowman,
and Ellis had determined that the daily energy budgets (DEB’s) of male
suburban Florida scrub-jays (see also; Avian
Ecology, pages 12-13) were
twice as high as the DEB’s of males in natural habitats at Archbold
Biological Station. In summer 1999, we were interested to learn if that
difference was reflected in the basal metabolic rate (BMR). BMR is a
function of evolutionary selection, whereas DEB is an index of
ecological demands. By looking at BMR, we could determine if there was a
physiological explanation for the difference in DEB’s and if there
were metabolic differences related to either season or gender. No
difference in BMR was detected between day and night or among seasons
(spring, summer, fall). We were unable to show a molting effect on BMR.
We found that suburban breeding males have a BMR 14% higher than
breeding males in natural habitat, but it is not significantly higher.
Scrub-jay BMR is 81.2% of that expected for a passerine bird of its
size, including the blue jay. This is consistent with our findings that
scrub-jay DEB is low.
Ronald Mumme (see photo, this page), a regular visitor to Archbold since 1986,
continued his research on the conservation biology of Florida
scrub-jays. He, and Stephan Schoech, have primary responsibility
for censusing and maintaining records of the scrub-jay population in the
scrub-jay "south tract," (tracts 19,30,31, & Hicoria; see
map [b], this page) the portion of Archbold south of the main scrub-jay
study area (the scrub-jay "demography tract"). During 1999-00,
Mumme focused on the extent of roadside mortality in the jays along Old
State Road 8 since the 1995 widening of the right-of-way. Results
obtained from the experimental tract during 1986-95, before the
right-of-way widening, were published (2000) in Conservation Biology
in a paper co-authored with Schoech, Glen Woolfenden, and John
Fitzpatrick.
[Mumme, R.L., S.J. Schoech, G.E. Woolfenden, and J.W. Fitzpatrick. 2000.
Life in the fast lane: demographic consequences of road mortality in the
Florida scrub-jay. Conserv. Biol. 14:501-512.]
Stephan Schoech (see photo, this page) has been collaborating with Reed Bowman
on a study of the nutritional physiology of Florida scrub-jays. They
noticed that suburban jays, which Bowman has been studying since 1992
(see also; Avian Ecology, pages 12-13), always initiate reproduction
earlier than jays in natural habitats at Archbold. This difference may
be attributable to abundant anthropogenic foods available in the suburbs
and may be expressed as a difference in the reproductive physiology of
breeding females between the two sites. A 1998 pilot study compared a
number of physiological parameters in breeding females at the two
populations, e. g., plasma levels of calcium, protein, and the
reproductive hormones luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2),
as well as total body lipids, a measure of condition. Results suggested
that Archbold jays might be limited by dietary proteins. Furthermore,
the utilization of stored fats by females at both sites in the period
immediately preceding egg-laying hints at a role for lipids in a female’s
decision of when to initiate reproduction.
An NSF grant has allowed them to conduct follow-up experiments to
determine whether protein, fat, or a combination of both were critical.
During 2000, in the scrub-jay "south tract" (see Mumme, above
& map [b], this page)
of Archbold, they provided jay families with custom-made supplemental
diets that were either high in fat or high in fat and protein (a diet
high in just protein was unpalatable). All supplemented jays advanced
the date of clutch initiation relative to unsupplemented controls.
Although females fed fat plus protein tended to lay earlier than those
fed fat alone, there was no statistical difference. Supplemented females
laid larger clutches and had more young survive to independence,
suggesting a fitness benefit to early breeding. These findings fail to
support the hypothesis that jays in natural habitats are protein limited
but rather suggest that the high-energy fat is important by increasing
the overall condition of a female. Future work includes endocrine
analyses (LH, E2, and leptin) of the blood samples from 2000.
Information about the hormonal status of breeding females will give us a
better understanding of the effect of nutrition on the reproductive
physiology of female scrub-jays.
Biennial Contents | Home
| Top | Index
~
© Archbold Biological Station, 1 February
2002, with minor changes from the paper edition.
Webmaster: Fred E.
Lohrer, email: flohrer@archbold-station.org
Archbold Biological Station, P.O. Box 2057, Lake Placid,
Florida 33862 USA
Phone: 863-465-2571, FAX: 863-699-1927, Email: archbold@archbold-station.org
|