Archbold Biological Station, Biennial Report 1999-2000



Cumulative number of scientific publications by Archbold staff and visiting scientists, 1941-2000. Source: < http://www.archbold-station.org/
RIS/RISWEB.ISA
>.

Accomplishments 1999-00

  • Resident scientists conducted over 215 separate projects, see Appendix C.

  • More than 95 visiting scientists from 44 colleges and universities, 2 museums and botanical gardens, 7 government agencies, and 2 private organizations, and 6 independent scientists, conducted over 94 projects at Archbold, see Appendix D.

  • Twenty-six graduate students conducted thesis research at Archbold, see Appendix D.

  • Twenty federal grants/contracts totaling $563,013 were funded for ecology and other field biology research in central Florida, see Appendix E.

  • Twenty-six state or private grants provided $858,500 for research, monitoring, and biological inventory, see Appendix E.

  • Staff presented 64 papers at professional meetings, see Appendix F.

  • Scientific staff added 53 publications to the Archbold scientific bibliography and visiting scientists contributed 37 more, bringing the accumulated total over 60 years to 1,316, see Appendices A & B and figure above.


RESEARCH

Executive Director: Hilary M. Swain    [ Biennial Contents ]

There is extensive recognition of the growing role of field stations as biological observatories, examining the processes and dynamics underlying biodiversity, particularly within the context of environmental variation and anthropogenic change. This biennial review of Archbold’s research contributions in the past 2 years confirms our important role in the global network of biological observatories. In 1999 and 2000 staff and visiting investigators at Archbold have continued to explore, document, and monitor biodiversity. Further recognition of our biological observatory role came in January 2000 when we hosted a National Science Foundation sponsored workshop, an assembly of 30 eminent ecologists to discuss a proposed National Ecological Observatory Network or NEON <http://www.archbold-station.org/abs/neon/index.html> (see Conferences and Workshops, page 41).

     Archbold properly fulfills the role of biological observatory – with our significant focus on measuring the status and trends in biodiversity in the Florida scrub and surrounding environs, especially the unique and endangered biota. Our research examines the integrity of this ecosystem and its ability to support and enrich human life. Six components of research at Archbold address biodiversity discovery and elucidation.

     The composition of biodiversity. Archbold’s growing biodiversity inventory <www. http://www.archbold-station.org/abs/data/lists/biodiver.htm> confirms we are teeming with life. Our flora and fauna includes, to use the words in Dave Wilcove’s 1999 essay on the Lake Wales Ridge, "a Dr. Seuss-like collection of delightful oddities." We survey many taxonomic groups, facilitating analysis of patterns and relationships among and between taxa. Rapidly expanding our inventory are many non-indigenous species – such as the 27 non-indigenous ants known for Archbold, and catalogued recently by Mark Deyrup in a paper describing exotic ants, which now represent 25% of both Archbold’s and Florida’s total ant species. Having access to sufficient taxonomic expertise for many groups of organisms, particularly invertebrates, and the necessary infrastructure to house biological collections, enhances the success of our biodiversity inventory. Although we recognize our greatest biodiversity collection is that living extant in the field, on-site reference collections help place Archbold’s biological diversity into a global context.

     Analysis of spatial patterns of biodiversity. Examination of species distribution among the ancient sand ridges of Florida (see page 29, map [b]) leads to analyses at larger spatial scales. Recent biogeographic studies include Sam Marshall’s work on the evolutionary relationships among Florida’s nine burrowing wolf spiders in the genus Geolycosa (see Spider Research, page 20), suggesting the evolutionary processes that generated this observed pattern of divergence occurred from west to east, not north to south as previously proposed. Furthermore, spatially explicit studies have focused on other mechanisms generating biodiversity patterns, such as the structure of biota in relation to abiotic variables. For example, Eric Menges and the plant lab have conducted regional studies to examine plant distribution in relation to environmental gradients along the Lake Wales Ridge (see page 7, map [a]).

     Temporal patterns in biodiversity. Changes in patterns of biodiversity over time are best analyzed by comparing baseline information with repeated measures taken over the long-term, such as Jim Layne’s repeated measures of birds on roadside surveys (see Vertebrate Research, page 21). One of the Station’s most valuable datasets for the analysis of the trends in biodiversity, are the 38,000-60,000 year-long sedimentary paleontology records at lakes Annie, Tulane, and Buck by visiting investigators Eric Grimm and Bill Watts which continue to reveal long-term trends in relation to natural variation (see Vegetation and Climate History, page 22).

     The processes of biodiversity. The observations of Mark Deyrup, in collaboration with visiting investigators including recent Fullbright Fellow Jayanthi Edirisinghe from Sri Lanka, are helping to build a complex database of insect-plant interactions and contribute to our understanding of the dynamic patterns of biodiversity, and how this is influenced by phylogenetic and ecological dynamics. Their studies of 115 species of bees and the 136 species of flowering plants they visit (see Entomological Research, pages 17-18) provide insight into the complexities involved in the maintenance and functioning of biodiversity.

     The function of biodiversity. Studies such as those by graduate student Christine Hawkes (see Student Research, page 37) at the Station have examined the relationships between biodiversity and the structure and functioning of ecosystems. Christine found soil crusts in Florida scrub were composed of approximately 35 morphotypes of cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algae, with more species isolated from crusts in sites < 8 years post-fire compared to older sites. Addition of 15N as a tracer indicated these crusts fix nitrogen, compete with plants for nitrogen in rainfall, and retain nitrogen in the system that would otherwise be lost so that it becomes available to plants at a later time. Her conclusions are that crusts are an important component of scrub biodiversity and may be in part responsible for the landscape we observe.

     The human dimensions of biodiversity. Human activities encroach upon and respond to aspects of biodiversity. Examples here include Reed Bowman’s (see Avian Ecology, pages 12-13) studies of how demographic rates in Florida scrub-jays are significantly diminished in relation to human settlement density. At the Ranch, Patrick Bohlen and many collaborators from the University of Florida, are monitoring watershed function with detailed interdisciplinary sampling of biogeochemical processes to determine the effects of socio-economic, ecological, and physical factors on ecosystem processes (see MAERC, pages 23-26).

     Facilities. To accomplish research programs at the Station and the Ranch we have continued to expand state-of-the-art facilities including environmental, analytical, and computational laboratories (see Appendix K). We now have two Trimble GPS units in use full-time. GIS capabilities and digital coverages (such as vegetation and boundary maps for many sites on the Lake Wales Ridge; see page 29) have expanded, increasing our ability to identify research sites and process and analyze data. The Station works constantly to upgrade and maintain informatics and communications capabilities to link researchers at the Station and the Ranch with each other, and with colleagues at other field stations and research sites. Chris Brand is developing a new informatics WWW-based research catalogue to track all ongoing research projects at the Station and the Ranch. Reference collections continue to improve; Walter Meshaka completed extensive curation in the herpetological and fishes wet collection, and the herbarium is now managed in the collections-management software Biota®. Climatic instrumentation has been added to provide critical resolution for spatial and temporal patterns of precipitation and temperature, especially for Ranch research with 4 fully-instrumented weather sites and 19 automated and manual rain gauges installed over the 10,300 acres. Patrick Bohlen, with financial support from a series of USDA and other grants, has further developed on-site instrumentation at the Ranch for examining soil C, P, and N.

     Archbold’s research program continues to have an impact on the biological sciences by providing a research platform for biodiversity scientists trained in systematics, ecology, conservation biology, population biology, informatics, agro-ecology, and geospatial sciences. Over the past 2 years we provided research programs with the requisite long-term security and continuity to observe and study the nature, scope, and changing patterns of biodiversity. Our work is leading to an improved understanding of the evolutionary history of Florida’s biota. Archbold discoveries continue to act as early warnings of changes in biodiversity in Florida’s scrub and working cattle ranch landscapes. At the same time, our inventories provide a baseline against which to measure and document future environmental change. This biennial review of our research activities supports the widespread appreciation that Archbold continues to be a strategic location to measure the nature and pace of biological change.

Cumulative number of scientific publications by Archbold staff and visiting scientists, 1941-2000. Source: < http://www.archbold-station.org/RIS/RISWEB.ISA>.

Biennial Contents | Home | Top | Index

© Archbold Biological Station, 1 February 2002.
blkball.gif (842 bytes) Webmaster: Fred E. Lohrer, email: flohrer@archbold-station.org

blkball.gif (842 bytes) Archbold Biological Station, P.O. Box 2057, Lake Placid, Florida 33862 USA
Phone: 863-465-2571, FAX: 863-699-1927, Email: archbold@archbold-station.org